Legal Opinion

United States v. McIntosh

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 8, 2015No. 14-0685/AFPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant argues that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to seek admission of the results of two potentially exculpatory physical examinations of the victim. We hold that trial defense counsel’s performance was not deficient and, therefore, not constitutionally ineffective.

I. Background

Appellant raped and assaulted his stepdaughter beginning in 2006 and ending in April 2010. A general court-martial convicted him of one specification of rape of a child between twelve and sixteen years of age on divers occasions over a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. DatavsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  4. Poole v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CaptainCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  2. United States v. HarpoleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  3. United States v. Private First Class DESTRO M. DELA PENAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  4. United States v. Sergeant RAYMOND P. PASAYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API