Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 6, 1969No. 68-536PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant Earl E. Hill appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence, consequent upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of manslaughter.

Only one question is urged before this Court on appeal, and that is whether it is necessary, in order to render admissible an oral confession made by the accused soon after his arrest at the scene of the homicide, that he give an affirmative waiver in some positive form, either verbal or written, of his right to counsel before being interrogated, in addition to the usual cautionary “Miranda warnings” by the officer. We hold that Miranda…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brisbon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Colebrook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. Patrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Lattimore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. State v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API