Legal Opinion

Wildenstein v. 5H&CO, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 24, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*489Plaintiff hired the corporate defendant, 5H&Co, to perform renovations to her apartment. Pursuant to a contract, defendant was to render its services based on an hourly rate and plaintiff would reimburse it for expenses. Defendants provided an estimate as to how long it would take to complete the project, but the project ran into serious cost and time overruns. Plaintiff claims that defendant Stojanovic represented himself to be an architect and held out 5H&Co, his company, as qualified to perform the home improvement services plaintiff wanted. However, contrary to these representations,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. I.C.C. Metals, Inc. v. Municipal Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. GoSmile, Inc. v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API