Legal Opinion

Schoemann v. Schoemann

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1995No. 94-CA-2541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

|1KLEES, Judge.

Plaintiffs claim for medical expenses was dismissed by a judge of the Office of Worker’s Compensation Administration [O.W.C.A.] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The O.W.C.A. reasoned that plaintiffs suit belongs in civil district court because it seeks enforcement of a prior district court judgment. Defendants appeal the dismissal, arguing that the plaintiffs claim should remain in the O.W.C.A. We affirm.

The procedural history of the litigation is relevant to the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. On November 25,1985, the plaintiff, Rudolph R. Schoemann, III, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. Highlands Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Schoemann v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guidry v. Cytec IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API