Legal Opinion
Keats v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 23, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2013-1524Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RONALD KEATS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-1524 (TSC) ) ) KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Ronald and Kathleen Keats bring this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),
5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, against the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) challenging the agency’s denial of Ronald’s request for voluntary retirement as arbitrary and capricious. 1 Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Stuttering Found. of America v. SpringerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- A.L. Pharma, Inc. v. Donna E. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.