Legal Opinion

MOUHAB Z. RIZKALLAH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 3, 2021Published

1Opinion of the Court

RIZKALLAH vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 100 Mass. App. Ct. 533

MOUHAB Z. RIZKALLAH vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

100 Mass. App. Ct. 533

September 9, 2021 - December 3, 2021

Court Below: Superior Court, Essex County

Present: Vuono, Blake, & Englander, JJ.

Dentist. MassHealth. Medicaid. Attorney General. Practice, Civil, Moot case, Declaratory proceeding, Dismissal. Declaratory Relief. Jurisdiction, Declaratory relief.

This court could not grant meaningful relief to an individual who was the subject of a civil investigative demand (demand) by the Attorney General, and who had been ordered by a Superior Court judge to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Zotal, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Meyer v. WagnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Jordan Hospital, Inc. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API