Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Nason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2006Published

1Concurrence

Crew III, J.P. (concurring).

On constraint of the holding in People v Lopez (6 NY3d 248 [2006]), I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that defendant waived his right to appeal. In Lopez, the Court of Appeals held that “[t]he record must establish that the defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” (id. at 256). As pointed out by *820the majority, here, at the commencement of the plea proceedings, County Court recited the terms of the plea agreement and the prosecutor added that defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. PopsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. ThreattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. TrotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API