Legal Opinion

In Re Severin

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1922No. Crim. No. 2442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to procure the discharge of petitioner from custody of the sheriff. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

After a preliminary examination upon a complaint charging the petitioner with the crime of embezzlement he was held to answer therefor and committed to the custody of the sheriff. He seeks release on habeas corpus on the ground that the order holding him to answer was made without reasonable or probable cause.

The evidence taken on the preliminary examination is set forth in the petition. It shows that the petitioner obtained from the complaining witness the sum of six hundred dollars upon representations made by him to said witness that he, the petitioner, had formed a partnership to carry on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte KeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ex parte BraniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Ex parte NicholasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. SobiekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. In Re MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. People v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. People v. BrodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API