Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Wiebe
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 24, 1992No. 90C-30002; CA A71058PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Husband appeals a dissolution judgment that required him to pay college expenses for the parties’ two minor children. He argues that the trial court was without the authority to impose such an obligation. We modify the judgment.
In addition to husband’s child support obligation, the trial court required husband to
“pay for not less than four years of college education for [the parties’ minor children],:j: :jí i}c
“The obligation to pay for a child’s college education is in addition to and is not limited by any statutory provision regarding the payment of child support, including the provisions…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Nash v. MulleTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- In re the Marriage of MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In re Marriage of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of SeeverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.