Legal Opinion
Kristen Burnham v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 2013No. 15-35380UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Plaintiff Kristen Burnham (“Burnham”) appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we will not recount it here.
I
We review the district court’s decisions concerning discovery for an abuse of discretion. Preminger v. Peake, 552 F.3d 757, 768 n. 10 (9th Cir.2008). Rule 16(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. LemahieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey and Jerry Howard, Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey Steve VincentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry John TISOR, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- James Edward Hegler v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Dan LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Loren Samuel WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe One v. CVS Health CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Shields v. Credit One Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023