Legal Opinion

Manius v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1944No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an action in trespass by Edyth Manius and John F. Manius, her husband, appellants, against their landlord, the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, appellee, to recover damages for injuries sustained by the wife appellant, when a gas stove at which she was working exploded. The court below refused to take off a compulsory non-suit for the sole reason that their lease contained a full discharge of appellee’s liability for the alleged negligence. This appeal followed.

On January 14, 1942, The Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, appellee,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brush v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Stoneboro & Chautauqua Lake Ice Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Crowell v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Boyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Lincoln Pulp & Paper Co., Inc. v. Dravo Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API