Diehl v. Stewartstown Railroad

The defendant has filed a motion to strike off the statement filed by the plaintiffs in this case for the following stated reasons:

“1. The plaintiff’s statement does not contain an endorsement of an ‘address within the county where all papers are to be served,’ as required by section 9 [10] of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483.”

An inspection of -the statement shows that the exception is well taken.

The requirement of section 10 of the Practice Act of 1915 is that the statement of claim shall be endorsed as follows: “To the within defendant: You are required to file an affidavit of…