Legal Opinion

Hale v. McGinley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1938No. 8677PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

The plaintiff labored for defendants, who were in the timber business. They were not subscribers to the Workmen’s Compensation Fund. In the course of plaintiff’s employment, his hand was painfully cut and per manently injured by an axe wielded by Charles Frazier, a fellow workman. For that injury, plaintiff recovered a judgment of $1500.00.

There were no eye witnesses of the accident besides plaintiff and Frazier, and their accounts differ. Plaintiff testified that he was uncovering the root of a walnut stump with a mattock; that as he raised the mattock, the axe struck his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Brosnan v. BoggsOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. McCarthy v. Waltham Co-operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walker v. Monongahela Power CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. O'Brien v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bragg v. C. I. Whitten Transfer Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Jenkins v. SpitlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Horchler v. Van ZandtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API