Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Pinckney

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBekgan, J.

As taxpayer of Albany County, plaintiffs maintain this action to restrain the defendant Commissioner of Jurors from carrying out the provisions of chapter 206 of the Laws of 1944. The Attorney-General has intervened and has been added as a defendant. The statute enacts numerous provisions affecting the office of commissioner of jurors and makes provisions with reference to the preparation of trial and grand jury lists, and to eligibility of jurors. Plaintiffs say that the statute is a local bill for the selecting, drawing and summoning of jurors prohibited by section 17 of article I'll of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. People Ex Rel. New York Electric Lines Co. v. SquireNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Matter of McAneny v. . Bd. of Estimate, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. County of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. PriorNew York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API