Legal Opinion

Ingerman v. State ex rel. Conroy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1891No. 14,879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The petition of the relator, wherein he prays that a writ of mandamus be issued against the appellant, contains these material allegations : That Ingerman is the duly appointed and acting ditch commissioner; that as such commissioner he entered into a contract with the relator for the construction of a public ditch • that the relator performed his part of the work so far as the appellant permitted him to do without cessation; that work was for a time stopped by order of the appellant, but was afterwards resumed by the appellant’s order and carried to completion; that the appellant collected…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
  3. State ex rel. Hull v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. State ex rel. Lee v. SchaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. State ex rel. Poyser v. Trustees of Salem ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Porter v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Wood v. State ex rel. SeilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Indiana Revenue Board v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Board of Trustees v. State ex rel. EatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API