Ingerman v. State ex rel. Conroy
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The petition of the relator, wherein he prays that a writ of mandamus be issued against the appellant, contains these material allegations : That Ingerman is the duly appointed and acting ditch commissioner; that as such commissioner he entered into a contract with the relator for the construction of a public ditch • that the relator performed his part of the work so far as the appellant permitted him to do without cessation; that work was for a time stopped by order of the appellant, but was afterwards resumed by the appellant’s order and carried to completion; that the appellant collected…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- State ex rel. Hull v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- State ex rel. Lee v. SchaackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- State ex rel. Poyser v. Trustees of Salem ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Porter v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Wood v. State ex rel. SeilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Indiana Revenue Board v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Board of Trustees v. State ex rel. EatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.