Legal Opinion

Hamill-Quinlan, Inc. v. Fisher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1991No. 01261PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-appellee in a contract action. Appellants raise the following evidentiary claims on appeal:

[I] DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN ADMITTING EVIDENCE REGARDING INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS?

[II] WAS THE ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF AN UNDATED COPY OF A DOCUMENT CONTRARY TO THE BEST EVIDENCE RULE AND DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN ALLOWING EVIDENCE SURROUNDING THE DOCUMENT?

Brief for Appellants at 3. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On September 11, 1985, appellants, Donald F. Fisher and Harry A. Digby, entered into an exclusive,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Paperry v. RybackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Bethel Mart AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Hera v. McCormickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Com. v. Talley, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. In Re ShahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API