Legal Opinion

Brook v. Prentice

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 5, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00833Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION KIMBERLY BROOK, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:21cv833 DRL TANNER PRENTICE, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Kimberly Brook was injured by Officer Tanner Prentice during her arrest. She claims Officer Prentice used excessive force in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and committed Indiana civil battery. Officer Prentice seeks summary judgment on both claims. The court grants summary judgment. BACKGROUND The following facts are those established by the record on summary judgment, as viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API