Legal Opinion

Heard v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 1943No. 8 Div. 360PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was tried upon an indictment which alleged: “The Grand Jury of said County charge that before the finding of this indictment Sherman Heard, alias William Sherman Heard, whose name is to the Grand Jury otherwise unknown than as stated, having a wife then living, unlawfully married one Jewell Willbanks, or did continue to cohabit with the said Jewell Willbanks in this state, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama.”

Such a joinder was permissible under Title 15, § 249 of the Code 1940, which reads as follows: “When offenses are of the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mastoras v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. MacMahon v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herrod v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API