Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between I. Miller & Sons, Inc., & United Office & Professional Workers
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Motion to stay arbitration is denied.
The petitioners are employees of a concern known as I. Miller & Sons, Inc. This concern and the respondent union entered into an agreement on August 21, 1947, which expires on April 28, 1949. It provides, among other things, that all future employees of said I. Miller & Sons, Inc., shall, as a condition of employment, after thirty working days, be required to become and remain members in good standing of the union during the term of said agreement. It further provides that in the event the employer during the term of said agreement requires additional…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schafran & Finkel, Inc. v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Webster v. Van AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Busch Jewelry Co. v. United RetaIl Employees' Union, Local 830New York Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Iroquois Beverage Corp. v. International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- P.A. Building Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Soto v. Lenscraft Optical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958