City of Hannibal v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
The city of Hannibal established a street across the track of defendant’s road, and on appeal to the Common Pleas the proceedings were dismissed. Defendant claims that the city had no right to establish the street;
1. Because no power to establish any new street is given in the charter; the power being to open new streets, which counsel would limit to opening streets contained in the plan of the city and of its additions. The power to open a street appears to be used in the city charter as synonymous with the power to lay out and establish such street. I infer this, because otherwise this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Young v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- American Tobacco Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Kansas City Suburban Belt Railroad v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Cleveland v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- State ex rel. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. District CourtwSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.