Legal Opinion

City of Hannibal v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1872PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The city of Hannibal established a street across the track of defendant’s road, and on appeal to the Common Pleas the proceedings were dismissed. Defendant claims that the city had no right to establish the street;

1. Because no power to establish any new street is given in the charter; the power being to open new streets, which counsel would limit to opening streets contained in the plan of the city and of its additions. The power to open a street appears to be used in the city charter as synonymous with the power to lay out and establish such street. I infer this, because otherwise this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Kansas City Suburban Belt Railroad v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Cleveland v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. State ex rel. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. District CourtwSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API