Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Houghton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 1994No. 92-2351Published

1Per curiam

This is a workers’ compensation ease. Claimant filed a claim for benefits naming appellee Mickey Chase Enterprises as the employer and appellant (Aetna) as the carrier. Several months earlier, Aetna had filed a notice of denial, in which it asserted that “Aetna coverage for the Employer expired 5/31/90 and was reinstated 8/17/90. Mickey Chas.e Enterprises was uninsured from 5/31/90 through 8/17/90 which includes the date of accident: 8/16/90.” It is undisputed that, although it had notice of the time and place of both the pretrial conference and the merits hearing, no representative of Aetna…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bay Automotive v. AllaireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API