City of Cleveland v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
In July, 1930, the city of Cleveland, appellant, planned the construction of a sewer known as tins Cuyahoga Yalley Main Sewer and let the work to a contractor. It was to pass across the right of way and under the tracks of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, appellee, west of the intersection *90of West Third street and Huston avenue. By September 17 the contractor had excavated up to appellee’s property line and appellant had concluded negotiations for an easement through and under the property for the construction and maintenance of the sewer. These negotiations were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Youngstown Boiler & Tank Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- Batson-Cook Co. v. Industrial Steel ErectorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Princemont Construction Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Buffa v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Chicago Packaged Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.