Legal Opinion

Jalbert v. Mulligan (In re Mulligan)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 27, 2017No. Case No.: 10-50037 (AMN); Adv. Pro. No. 10-05023 (AMN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re: ECF No. 63, 57, 61, 62, 63, 67, 82, 95, 96; 101; 105

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. AFTER RECONSIDERATION

ANN M. Nevins, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

The issue before the court is whether a June 11, 2013, decision entered in a Connecticut Superior Court (the “State Court”) case between the parties to this adversary proceeding should have preclu-sive effect over the claims pending here based on the doctrine of collateral estop-pel. If it does, this court must find that some or all of plaintiffs’ claims against the defendant in this…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pointe Residential Builders BH, LLC v. Paige, IIIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  2. Ruszkowski, Jr. v. MorgadoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  3. Ruszkowski, Jr. v. MorgadoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  4. Village Mortgage Company v. VenezianoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API