Legal Opinion

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Schreindl

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1929No. 5684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This case belongs to the same class as Sacramento Suburban Eruit Lands Co. v. Melin, 36 F.(2d) 907, this day decided.

The errors specified in the brief are: The overruling of a demurrer to the complaint; the admission of testimony on cross-examination over objection; an instruction in reference to the value’ of the land for poultry •raising; the refusal of the court to give a requested instruction on the statute of limitations and the failure to fully instruct on that subject, and an instruction in reference to the contents of a certain pamphlet in evidence.

The demurrer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. MelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. FredericksenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. Standard Factors Corp. v. National Rubber Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API