Legal Opinion
Walnut Associates v. Saidel
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-CV-2795PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court are defendants Daniel H. Saidel, Jonathan A. Saidel, Richard M. Sand, individually and t/a Saidel, Sand, & Saidel, and James J. Smith’s motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, or in the alternative, for abstention, plaintiff Walnut Associates’ responses, and defendants’ replies thereto. For the following the reasons, the court will grant defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I. Background
The plaintiff in this case is Walnut…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Lunderstadt v. ColafellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Donaldson v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- MSR Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Federal-Mogul Global Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Holly's, Inc. v. City of Kentwood (In Re Holly's, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
- Poplar Run Five Ltd. Partnership v. Virginia Electric & Power Co. (In Re Poplar Run Five Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.