Legal Opinion
Rabanco, Ltd. v. Weitzel
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 28, 1989No. 9421-9-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
—The Weitzels move to modify the Commissioner's denial of their motion for discretionary review. The motion is denied.
Rabanco, Ltd., brought an action against Grant County and the Grant County commissioners for breach of contract. It also sued Jim and Dorothy Weitzel individually, alleging tortious conduct. The action was filed in the Benton-Franklin County judicial district pursuant to RCW 36.01.050.1 All parties except Grant County and the Weit-zels have been dismissed from Rabanco's action.
The Weitzels moved to dismiss, citing Aydelotte v. Audette, 110 Wn.2d 249, 750 P.2d 1276 (1988). The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Aydelotte v. AudetteWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. Kitsap County Sewer District No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cossel v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Johanson v. City of CentraliaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Eubanks v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Bruneau v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990