Legal Opinion

United States v. Francisco Rangel-Navarro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1990No. 89-10412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILLIAM, District Judge:

Francisco Rangel-Navarro challenges his sentence under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which the district court entered following his plea of guilty to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1326. Rangel-Navarro contends that a civil declaration of wardship by a California Juvenile Court does not constitute a criminal sentence for the purposes of a two-point increase in his criminal history rating pursuant to Guideline section 4A1.2(d). Guideline section 4A1.2(d), read in conjunction with Application Note 7…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Diego RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Daniel Cervantes LucateroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Grier v. K.D.K.California Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric N. UngerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Robert Rodriguez Carrillo, United States of America v. Carlos Alonzo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Timothy BootenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API