Legal Opinion

In re Smith

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Decision of Board of General Appraisers.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant imported merchandise which he claims should have been classified under paragraph 340 of the tariff act of June 24, 1897, as “lace window curtains, * * * finished or unfinished, made upon the Nottingham lace-curtain machine, or on the Nottingham warp machine.” The fact, however, is that these curtains, as imported, were only partially made on a Nottingham machine. They were in part manufactured — not merely “finished” — upon another and entirely distinct machine, which greatly enhanced their value. Upon this ground the board of general appraisers overruled…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. KurtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API