Davenport v. . Phelps
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
In actions to convert a deed absolute on its face into a mortgage or security for a debt, the authorities are one in holding that upon proper preliminary allegation, as that a clause of redemption was intended to be inserted in the instrument, but was omitted by the ignorance or mistake of the draftsman, or by some fraud or circumvention of the opposite party, or some oppression or advantage taken of plaintiffs’ necessities, equity will afford relief by considering the clause thus shown to have been omitted, as if it had been set out in the instrument, provided the matter can be…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Bonham v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Perry v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Watkins v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williamson v. . RabonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Perkins v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958