Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kolojeski v. John Deisher, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1968No. Appeal, 164Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

In its opinion sustaining defendant’s preliminary objections, the lower court frankly admits that a valid cause of action would exist if the use of lead based paint “constituted a latent dangerous condition of which defendants had or should have had knowledge and plaintiffs did not.” See Lopez v. Gukenback, 391 Pa. 359, 137 A. 2d 771 (1958); Restatement 2d, Torts, §358(1). This language is then echoed by the majority of this Court which recites that liability would exist if the use of the paint “constituted the creation of a dangerous condition of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lopez v. GukenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Schelly v. GribbinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API