Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heirs of David v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1862Published

Appeal from the Third District Oom-t oí New Orleans, Bmiiyuaaud, J.

1Dissent

Mebeiok, C. J.,

dissenting.- In the rear .of Faubourg Annunciation,

- 'as laid out by Robin and Livaudais, and forming .the rear, boundary of the six-squares numbered from 91 to 96 .inclusive,, was-a long-avenue '-'marked-on the plan “Cours-des Dryades¿” parallel with-and-not quite -sb'wide as-the avenue'-marked "on the same plan' “Cours des Náyades.” '--These two avenues are tlie'prés'ént Dryad and-Naiad-streets..-.. -,. .

“The'“Coitrs déS'Dryádes” was marked on- the plan' as o'nesingle ''■public place'; that is, it was entirely inclosed by black -lines'' (éxcépt-where '“'ihtersected' by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Shepherd v. Third MunicipalitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  3. McDonogh v. CallowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API