Legal Opinion

American Ball Bearing Co. v. Adams

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 12, 1915No. 190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the American Ball Bearing Company (the Kardo Company substituted as complainant) against Henry J. Adams, dealing, as the Reo Motor Sales Company.

1Opinion of the Court

CEARKE, District Judge.

This- is a suit in equity, in which infringement of letters patent of the United States No. 792,690 is claimed, with the usual prayer for an injunction and an accounting. The *969bill was filed on June 25, 1913. On motion of the Kardo Company, claiming to be a corporation of the state of Ohio, an order was entered on October 19, 1914, granting said the “Kardo Company” leave to file a bill in the nature of a supplemental bill, and that it be substituted for the American Ball Bearing Company as plaintiff in the suit.

Such a bill was filed on October 20, 1914, and in this bill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Flash v. ConnSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Secombe v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Ashley v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kardo Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Aberdeen Bindery, Inc. v. Eastern States Printing & Publishing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1938
  3. Sterne v. Fletcher American Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Barger v. Chesapeake & O. N. Ry.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API