Hinchliffe v. Fischer
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
The question presented is whether the decedent, Mary Ewing, succeeded in effectuating her desire to vest title in the appellees, Helen Ewing Fischer and Ferdinand Stanley Ewing, to a section of land in Hamilton County by a “Private Annuity Contract” she executed during her lifetime, or whether she failed therein and the real estate remained an asset of her estate, entitling the appellant, Vena Hinchliffe, one of the residuary devisees, to share therein.
The appellant will be referred to as Vena; the appellees as Helen and Ferdinand or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Anderson v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Rohr v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Sloan v. FrothinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Read v. Estate of DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974