Legal Opinion

In re the City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application by the city of New York for the appointment of commissioners to condemn certain lands for street opening purposes.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The Coney Island and Brooklyn Bail-road Company interposes an answer in this proceeding, claiming that Seneca avenue cannot be opened through its property. It owns the land sought to be taken between Willoughby avenue and DeKalb avenue. It also owns on both sides of the proposed street. That is, it now owns a large tract of land which will be bisected by this improvement. The property is used as a ear barn and for storage and other purposes; A large brick building, the car barn, is erected on the northeasterly line of Seneca avenue, extending from Willoughby ■ avenue to DeKalb avenue. This…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Adee v. . Nassau Electric Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Matter of City of New York (Newport Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. In re the Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. Town of East HavenConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
  2. In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In re the Bronx Parkway CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API