Legal Opinion

State v. Chaney

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2018No. CA2017–07–118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtS. Powell, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Douglas C. Chaney, appeals from the decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas ordering him to pay restitution in the amount of $83,783.96 to Procter & Gamble after he pled guilty to one count of grand theft. For the reasons outlined below, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On January 3, 2017, the Warren County Grand Jury returned an indictment charging Chaney with one count of grand theft in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(2), a fourth-degree felony, when, pursuant to R.C. 2913.02(B)(2), "the value of the property or services stolen is seven thousand five hundred dollars or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. GeldrichOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. Miller, Ca2007-11-295 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DentOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Janson v. Christ Hops., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Janson v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API