Legal Opinion

Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1997No. 1997-0164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 32.] GAMMARINO ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION, APPELLEE; RHODES, HAMILTON COUNTY AUDITOR, APPELLANT. [Cite as Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision,

1997-Ohio-361.] Taxation—Real property valuation—Complaint filed with county board of revision must comply with R.C. 5715.13—Preparation and filing of complaint with county board of revision by individual not authorized to practice law in Ohio and not an “agent” constitutes the unauthorized practice of law. (No. 97-164—Submitted July 23,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stanjim Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API