Legal Opinion

Md. Reclamation Assoc. v. Harford Cnty.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 24, 2020No. 52/19Published

1Opinion of the Court

Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County, Maryland, No. 52, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES – Maryland Reclamation Associates (“MRA”) was required to exhaust its administrative remedies by submitting all constitutional claims to the Board of Appeals (“Board”). MRA’s unconstitutional takings claim was no exception to this settled principle. Under our established case law, where a property owner is asserting an unconstitutional taking of its property arising from the application of a zoning regulation, as part of the administrative…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API