Legal Opinion

Doe v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 5, 1996No. 95-682Published

1Opinion of the Court

914 S.W.2d 312 (1996)

323 Ark. 237

Jane DOE, Appellant,

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., Appellees.

No. 95-682.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 5, 1996.

Phillip J. Duncan, Neil Chamberlin, Little Rock, for appellant.

Sammye L. Taylor, Troy A. Price, Little Rock, for Miss. Pacific Emp. Health.

Tonia P. Jones, Will Bond, Little Rock, for Michael Ramone.

William H. Sutton, John Dewey Watson, Little Rock, for Union Pacific.

JESSON, Chief Justice.

This appeal is taken from the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to prosecute her lawsuit under the pseudonym "Jane Doe." We hold that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Gipson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API