Legal Opinion
Hoover Color Corp. v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided July 30, 1998No. Civ.A. 98-0841-RPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Senior District Judge.
This case involves a claim of price discrimination in violation of the. Clayton Act, ch. 323, § 2, 38 Stat. 730 (1914), as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, ch. 592, § 1, 49 Stat. 1526 (1936) (codified as amended at 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(a)). Before me now is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The parties have fully briefed the issues involved, and have presented oral argument. The motion is, therefore, ripe for disposition. For the reasons contained herein, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Bayer [formerly known as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.