Legal Opinion · Dissent

Krenzer v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1896No. 17,654Published

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

McCabe, J.

After a careful and painstaking examination of tfie questions presented on tfie petition for a rehearing in this case, I find myself wholly unable to agree with tfie majority of tfie court in holding tfiat the petition for a rehearing ought to be overruled. I concur in tfiat part of tfie original opinion holding tfiat tfie appellee railroad company was guilty of neg*598ligence in running its engines at the time and place it ran over appellant’s leg, and inflicted the injuries complained of, and I also concur in the original opinion in holding that appellant at the…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API