Krenzer v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
McCabe, J.
After a careful and painstaking examination of tfie questions presented on tfie petition for a rehearing in this case, I find myself wholly unable to agree with tfie majority of tfie court in holding tfiat the petition for a rehearing ought to be overruled. I concur in tfiat part of tfie original opinion holding tfiat tfie appellee railroad company was guilty of neg*598ligence in running its engines at the time and place it ran over appellant’s leg, and inflicted the injuries complained of, and I also concur in the original opinion in holding that appellant at the…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.