Legal Opinion
Gates Learjet Corp. v. Magnasync Craig Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 25, 1972No. Civ. A. C-1796PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, District Judge.
This memorandum opinion contains and shall constitute the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The action is one for patent infringement ; it arises under the patent laws of the United States, and, accordingly, the Court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) which gives United States District Courts jurisdiction of civil actions arising under the patent laws to the exclusion of any jurisdiction in the state courts.
The patents here…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Geo Vann, Inc., Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987