Gray v. State

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty of the offenses of kidnapping, rape, and aggravated sodomy. We affirm.

1. Appellant enumerates as error the admission of a confession into evidence, claiming, among other things, that since the confession was induced by the interrogating officer’s promise of leniency, it was not freely and voluntarily elicited. As such, defendant contends, its admission violated his constitutional rights and was, perforce, reversible error. We cannot agree.

"Prior to the admission of the evidence of defendant’s confession, a Jackson v. Denno [cit.] hearing was held at…