Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Torrence

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 20, 1991No. 23403Published

1ConcurrenceToal, Justice

(concurring in result and joining Justice Chandler’s concurrence in result):

I join my brother Chandler’s concurrence in result in toto. I too would overrule State v. Atkins, 293 S.C. 294, 360 S.E. (2d) 302 (1987). However, I write separately for the majority of this Court for the purpose of expressing our abolition of the outdated doctrine of in favorem vitae.9 This doctrine served a useful function for many years, but today, in light of advances in the quality of legal representation; in light of the many protections and avenues of relief available to criminal defendants; and in light of the…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Gaskins v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API