Legal Opinion

In Re Tatnall

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 445.. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Kalisoh, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Parker, Lloyd, JJ. 2.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Dillard Homes, Inc. v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. BelkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Hamilton v. Memorial HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951