Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Figenskau v. McCoy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1936No. File No. 6386PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

The appellant is an “auto transportation company” as defined by chapter 179, Session Laws, N. D., 1935, operating a motor truck in “commercial freighting” as defined by chapter 181, Session Laws, N. D., 1935. He hauls lignite coal in his truck from his mine to customers and includes all or part of the cost of transportation in the delivered price. He has not complied with the orders of the North Dakota Railroad Commission purporting to be made pursuant to chapter 179 requiring the payment of a $15.00 registration fee for his truck, and has not filed evidence that he has secured public…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herr v. RudolfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Benson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. WarnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API