Friedlin v. Crockin
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of city of, Portsmouth, on. a motion for judgment for money. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
This controversy arises out of these circumstances: The plaintiff in error, through her agent, Charles R. Welton, leased certain property in the city of Portsmouth to Nathan Crockin, Incorporated, from July 1, 1912, to December 31, 1914, for $75.00 per month. At the time of the lease another tenant, who was not ready to vacate on July 1, 1912, occupied the property, and by consent was permitted to hold it until September 1, 1912. In the meantime the lessee had determined to give up its business, the stockholders had determined to dissolve the corporation, and the agent of the lessor was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hurst Hardware Co. v. GoodmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Engleby v. HarveySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Fields v. BurlingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawson v. States Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Mid-Atlantic Appliances, Inc. v. MorganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952