Legal Opinion

Pure Oil Co. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1931No. 3990Published

1Opinion

On Motion of Appellees for Rehearing.

We are unable to agree with the argument of the appellees that, as specially stated to be the main reason, the proceedings numbered 4286 was so at variance with and contrary to the statute as to render such proceedings for lease of the land null and void for all legal purposes. Thé proceedings numbered 4286 bad origin, not alone for the appointment of a guardian of “the estate,” but also for “the person,” of “a minor.” ‘ So it may be assumed, as we do, and as argued by the appellee, that there was no authority in the probate court in the proceedings…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wakefield Trust Company v. WhaleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API