People v. Soper
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
We have reviewed the facts as accurately set forth in Judge Danhof s opinion. We also agree with Judge Danhofs statement of the law of entrapment applicable to those facts. However, after careful consideration of the facts in light of the relevant legal principles, we conclude that defendant Soper was "induced to commit” the crime of delivery of heroin, United States v Russell, 411 US 423, 435; 93 S Ct 1637, 1644; 36 L Ed 2d 366, 375 (1973), because the police conduct in this case constituted entrapment as a matter of law.
*679The only reason the police officer investigated Soper was the latter’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. JamiesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. JuilletMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ArtusoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Batson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.