Legal Opinion

Dairy Engineering Corp. v. De-Raef Corp.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 17, 1941No. 549PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

The defendants seek a summary judgment or decree upon the ground that upon the pleadings, depositions, exhibits and affidavits heretofore submitted there is neither a factual nor legal question to be determined.

Plaintiff holds a patent covering a method or process for the preparation of frozen food products as well as the product itself. The defendant owns a process patent covering the method or process of preparing an agent for use in the confection of frozen comestibles.

Apparently the agent, material or elements covered by the defendants’ patented process is useful…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Port of Palm Beach Dist. v. GoethalsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric Railway Specialty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Garza v. FernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kissick Const. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of WahooDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  4. Bowdle v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  5. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API