Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chaleumphong

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 30, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The defendants, Viengsaymay Chaleumphong and Donnie Bouphavongsa, were convicted of the murder of Joshua Molina in the first degree on the theory of extreme atrocity or cruelty, and assault and battery of Juan Santana by means of a dangerous weapon. On appeal, Chaleumphong claims that the judge erred by (1) announcing during the third day of empanelment that he might seat fewer than sixteen jurors; (2) admitting vouching evidence, and permitting the prosecutor to vouch for witnesses during argument; (3) refitsing to instruct on voluntary intoxication; (4) lowering the Commonwealth’s burden in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. ToneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. CunneenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoatengMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. AuclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. MosesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. MilitelloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API